by Kimberley » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:18 pm
Harriers,
In reply to Phil's comments i should make the rationale of my study clearer. The cognitive activities of marathon runners has become a huge area of interest for researchers in the field. The main two coping strategies that have been identified are association and dissociation.
Association is when a runner will effectively read thier body, maintaining full awareness of their pace, as well as physiologyical factors critical to performance, including pain.
On the other hand, runners may dissociate, by cutting themselves off from the sensory feedback they would normally recieve during the run, due to the discomfort this might create. In dissociation the runner would concentrate on thoughts unrelated to the race, such as family problems, work etc, or just by counting or singing in their head, or chatting to another runner.
The literature states that dissociation could be debilitative to performance, as it may increase the potential for injury, or cause the runner to misjudge energy expenditure and thus perform below thier optimum.
For my study I am interested comparing the use of these two coping styles in runners of varying abilities. In marathon runners it was found that elite runners will primarily associate for the majority of the race, compared to recreational runners who will primarily dissociate. I am interested in looking at fell running for my study as little research has been done into coping strategies of this discipline.
Hope this clears things up a little more?? Any feedback would be appreciated!!
Thanks, Kim.